![]() 48 to impute a motive to defendant and (b) misremembering Randy Nesby’s testimony (2) defendant was denied a fair trial because the State was allowed to introduce prior inconsistent statements made by Navarro Howard and Cheonte Hinkle without the State satisfying the statutory requirements of section 115-10.1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Criminal Procedure Code) (725 ILCS 5/115-10.1 (West 2020)) to admit the evidence (3) defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial attorney failed to object to Cheonte Hinkle’s unsworn testimony and other hearsay testimony (4) defendant is entitled to a new trial because the continuum of error denied him his due process right to a fair trial (5) the trial court erred by failing to appoint him new counsel after a preliminary Krankel (People v. Defendant appeals, making the following arguments: (1) the trial court violated his right to due process by (a) improperly relying on People’s exhibit No. On October 15, 2021, the trial court sentenced defendant to three consecutive terms of life imprisonment followed by an additional consecutive term of 50 years. OPINION ♡ In February 2021, after a bench trial, the trial court found defendant guilty of nine counts of first degree murder, one count of attempt (first degree murder), and one count of aggravated battery. Justices Cavanagh and Zenoff concurred in the judgment and opinion. JUSTICE TURNER delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. 18CF734 Honorable John Casey Costigan, Judge Presiding. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean County No. 4-21-0612 JanuCarla Bender 4th District Appellate Court, IL IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |